[Ncep.list.nems.announce] Regression test for NEMS failed on Zeus
theurich at sourcespring.net
Tue Apr 1 20:26:16 UTC 2014
Hi Xingren, and Moorthi,
Have these files been restored on Zeus, or are we still expecting
different results in the regression tests wrt the baseline? Or has the
baseline been updated, too? Thanks,
On 03/31/2014 08:41 AM, Xingren Wu wrote:
> Thanks for checking.
> We found out the reason now. Moorthi updated some fix files (such as
> CO2) for GFS in his own directory on Zeus during the weekend, those
> files are also used for the regression test, but he was not aware of.
> That is why any new regression test for GFS is different from the baseline.
> On 3/31/2014 10:50 AM, Raghu Reddy wrote:
>> Hi Xingren,
>> As far as I know nothing has changed on the systems side.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Xingren Wu [mailto:xingren.wu at noaa.gov]
>> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 10:47 AM
>> To: Raghu Reddy; Ratko Vasic
>> Cc: ncep.list.nems.announce at lstsrv.ncep.noaa.gov
>> Subject: Regression test for NEMS failed on Zeus
>> Hi Raghu and Ratko,
>> Has anything changed on Zeus during the weekend? The NEMS regression test
>> for GFS failed for me since Saturday afternoon. Sarah Lu and Jun Wang
>> experienced the same issue. I checked out the trunk this morning, the test
>> also failed to match the baseline.
>> On 3/29/2014 11:34 PM, Xingren Wu wrote:
>>> My regression test on Zeus for GFS failed since Saturday afternoon. I
>>> tried to revert back to the version which passed on Friday but still
>>> failed in the test.
>>> Has anyone changed the base line during the weekend or anyone noticed
>>> any issue on Zeus?
>>> PS test msg output:
>>> Test 1
>>> Compare GFS results with previous trunk version GFS, 32 proc, 1 thread
>>> Checking test 1 results ....
>>> Comparing sigf00..... ......NOT OK
>>> sigf00 differ!
> Ncep.list.nems.announce mailing list
> Ncep.list.nems.announce at lstsrv.ncep.noaa.gov
More information about the Ncep.list.nems.announce