<div dir="ltr"><div><div>We're using 3600.<br><br></div>Anyway keep this value to be an integer multiple of the time step, elsewhere give error.<br><br></div>Marco<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2018-04-20 9:50 GMT+00:00 Pau <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pescribaa@aemet.es" target="_blank">pescribaa@aemet.es</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi Marco,</p>
<p>Thanks very much for the answer, we are going to test it right
now.</p>
<p>We should see if DFI changes our verification scores but I would
expect it doesn't, taking into account we are not doing analysis
cycling with NMMB. <br>
</p>
<p>Just a small question, apart from filter_method=3, are using the
regular values for filtering parameters:</p>
<p>nsecs_bcktdfi: 3600 # HALF backward filter window
(s) (TDFI)<br>
nsecs_fwdtdfi: 3600 # HALF forward filter window
(s) (TDFI)<br>
</p>
<p>?</p>
<p>In our case we are running with around 2.5 km horizontal
resolution and 5.625 seconds of time step. Probably we should make
some tunning of this parameters...<br>
</p>
<p>Many thanks.</p>
<p>Pau<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="m_4924499790318523189moz-cite-prefix">El 20/04/18 a les 10:37, Marco Biordi
ha escrit:<br>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Hello Pau,<br>
<br>
</div>
you can get t=0 missing parameters when you enable the Digital
Filter Initialization.<br>
<br>
Do that by setting configuration option "filter_method" to
value 1 or 2 or 3 (usual one).<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Regards<br>
</div>
<div><br>
Marco Biordi<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>San Marino Republic Weather Forecast Center<br>
</div>
<div><a href="http://meteo.sm" target="_blank">meteo.sm</a><br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2018-04-20 8:26 GMT+00:00 Pau <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pescribaa@aemet.es" target="_blank">pescribaa@aemet.es</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello all,<br>
<br>
I am a new user of NMMB model. I work at the Spanish Met
Agency with <br>
several NWP-LAM models. We are running daily NMMB at home
and we see <br>
that, after UPP processing, we don't get some surface
parameters like <br>
t2m, rh2m, u10m, v10m or visibility, at t=0, but we do for
any lead time <br>
t>0. After dedicating some time to look to UPP and NMMB
user's guides <br>
and namelists, I am quite sure this variables cannot be got
in an easy <br>
manner for t=0. Could anybody confirm me this? In such a
case, we have <br>
to do some further final work with vertical interpolations
and so.<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance!<br>
<br>
Pau Escriba<br>
<br>
Spanish Met Agency (AEMET)<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ncep.list.emc.nmmb-questions-a<wbr>nd-answers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ncep.list.emc.nmmb-questions-and-answers@lstsrv.ncep.noaa.gov" target="_blank">Ncep.list.emc.nmmb-questions-a<wbr>nd-answers@lstsrv.ncep.noaa.go<wbr>v</a><br>
<a href="https://www.lstsrv.ncep.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/ncep.list.emc.nmmb-questions-and-answers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.lstsrv.ncep.noaa.g<wbr>ov/mailman/listinfo/ncep.list.<wbr>emc.nmmb-questions-and-answers</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>