<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>I guess only NAM and HRRR assimilate ground-based radar data.
Something for HWRF to consider in the future.<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/25/2017 03:00 PM, Jili Dong -
NOAA Affiliate wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMP6LaqCMZWU+O0Sp6db+cYUFXvQMvyjo+6RWfxfs90tXVeOxw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="auto">
<div>Just curious if radial wind from any ground-based radar
goes into the model?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Several coastal radars have coverage for the storm since
last night (espically KBRO and KPRC). It could provide good
cross-beam wind coverage to analyze the change of storm wind
structure during secondary eyewall formation, either for
assimilation or verification.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jili</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div id="gmail-m_662452832148289047AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
On Aug 25, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Bin Liu - NOAA Affiliate <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:bin.liu@noaa.gov"
target="_blank">bin.liu@noaa.gov</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Yes, I was also looking at this. Very
impressive, and HWRF has several cycles predicted
similar double eyewall structures.
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?product=N0Z&rid=BRO&loop=yes"
target="_blank">https://radar.weather.gov/<wbr>radar.php?product=N0Z&rid=BRO&<wbr>loop=yes</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bin</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div class="gmail-m_662452832148289047gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><span
style="font-size:12.8px">
<div><span
style="font-size:12.8px">---</span><br>
</div>
<div><span
style="font-size:12.8px">Bin
Liu</span><br>
</div>
</span>
<div style="font-size:12.8px">NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC</div>
<div><span
style="font-size:12.8px">5830
University Research CT</span></div>
<div><span
style="font-size:12.8px">Cubicle
2026</span><br>
<span style="font-size:12.8px">College
Park, MD 20740</span><br>
<span style="font-size:12.8px">Tel: </span><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%28301%29%20683-3763"
value="+13016833763"
target="_blank">(301)-683-3763</a><br>
<span style="font-size:12.8px">Email:
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Bin.Liu@noaa.gov"
target="_blank">Bin.Liu@noaa.gov</a></span></div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:17
AM, Sergio Abarca <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:sergio.abarca@noaa.gov"
target="_blank">sergio.abarca@noaa.gov</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>All,</div>
<div>It looks like<b> Harvy has indeed a
concentric eyewall -with a very narrow moat-</b>.
See attached the radar image of the Brownsville
radar. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I list below 5 days worth of cycles that
included a forecasting time valid at 082506.
HWRF forecasted a concentric eyewalls (as
diagnosed by a secondary wind maxima in the
azimuthal average of wind, considering a prior
radial expansion of the tangential wind field)
at least in 50% of these cycles and 75% of the
cycles that have Harvey initialized in the Gulf
of Mexico. Those cycles initialized outside of
it, including the Caribbean had a harder time
forecasting it. </div>
<div>Sergio</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>All Harvey cycles with a forecasting hour
valid at 082506. Tose with secondary eyewall or
hints of it are <b>highlighted in bold face
listing the time when the secondary eyewall
was most apparent</b>:</div>
<div>082506</div>
<div>082500</div>
<div><b>082418 at f15 (very narrow moat)</b></div>
<div><b>082412 at f24</b></div>
<div><b>082406 has hints of it</b></div>
<div><b>082400 at f24</b></div>
<div><b>082318 at f18</b></div>
<div><b>082312 at f42</b></div>
<div>082306-can’t display</div>
<div><b>082300 at f48</b></div>
<div>082218 </div>
<div>082212 </div>
<div><b>082206 - h54</b></div>
<div>082200 </div>
<div><b>082118 at f72</b></div>
<div>082112 </div>
<div>082106 </div>
<div><b>082018 at f102</b></div>
<div>082012</div>
<div>082006 </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<img moz-do-not-send="true"
id="gmail-m_662452832148289047m_-6743121248958029762C288080D-97A0-441F-BF62-5EA5798811CA"></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
******************************************************
Dr. Vijay Tallapragada
Chief, Modeling and Data Assimilation Branch &
Acting Chief, Model Physics Group
Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP/NWS/NOAA/DOC
5830 University Research Court Room 2053
College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
Tel/Fax: (301)683-3672; Cell: (202)679-5629
******************************************************
</pre>
</body>
</html>